We use AI. Here's why you're not getting slop.
Everyone's inbox is full of it. Here's the honest version of how we use AI, what we won't do with it, and where you sit in the process.
Cross-border AI marketing expert running content and search systems across Google, Bing and Yandex in English and Russian. Specialises in supplement and sports-nutrition brands. Founder of Staffless and of 13Lives, sold in three countries.
So is AI marketing content just slop?
Sometimes, yes. But slop is what you get when content is made in volume with nobody steering it and nobody approving it, and that existed long before any of this. It used to come from paying someone offshore five dollars an hour to copy and paste a hundred emails out of a Gmail account. The tool got better. The steering didn't.
You've had the emails. You get about three lines in and you already know a person didn't write it, because nobody actually talks like that. You've had the voicemails too, where the voice is just a fraction too smooth and the pauses land in slightly the wrong places. And then you open LinkedIn and it's wall to wall.
So when somebody tells you they run marketing with AI, you already know what that probably means, and honestly, you're right to be sceptical about it.
But I'll tell you the part that gets missed in all of this, which is that none of it is actually new.
Same output as we've always had. It's just got a cooler name now than it did before. What actually changed is that everyone can reach it, not that anyone got worse.
Nobody sets out to make slop
They make it because they've got no direction, and they've got no direction because they're busy running a business and nobody ever sat them down and explained what good looks like in this particular job. You don't know what you don't know. And when you don't know, what you produce is the most basic generic version of the thing you never learned, which is exactly what you'd expect.
I've watched this happen with a model open in front of me. Ask it for a supplement label when you've got no concept of branding or design, and what comes back is a bit of red, a bit of black, and some writing. It is technically a label. There's no design element to it, nothing independent about it, no feel, no soul. And the person who asked for it usually can't tell you what's wrong with it, only that something is.
The model did what it was told. The problem was upstream.
An LLM only learns what you teach it
That's the whole thing, really. It's a language model. Feed it generic and it will hand you generic back, politely, instantly, and forever, and it will never once tell you that the brief was thin.
Which is why "just use ChatGPT yourself" isn't the answer it sounds like. Building the context that machine needs is a job in itself, and it's a job that looks a lot like the one you were trying to avoid. Quite frankly, if you don't have the time to make the content, you probably don't have the time to learn the AI either.
Everyone has access to the same tools now. Almost nobody builds anything with them.
What actually happens to your posts
Let me just walk you through it, because I think the process is the answer here.
We make the content. You see all of it. If there's something you don't like, you flag it, and then we get on a call and talk about *why* you didn't like it. Was it the look. Was it the angle. Was it that it didn't sound like you. And whatever comes out of that conversation goes into your file.
That's the bit that matters, and it's the bit generic tools throw in the bin. Every session with a normal AI starts with a stranger, so your rejection today teaches it nothing about tomorrow. Here, a rejection is the best information we get all month, because it's the only thing that tells us where the edge of your taste actually is. Next batch is closer. The one after that is closer again.
Now, sometimes you'll knock something back because it isn't fun, and the honest answer is that it was never meant to be. There's top of funnel, middle and bottom, and they do different jobs. Some posts exist to be interesting and some exist to convert, and part of what you're paying me for is to say that out loud rather than nodding along and quietly building you a feed full of entertainment that never sells anything.
Nothing publishes without your yes. That's the default, and it stays the default unless you change it.
What usually happens is that somewhere around month two or three, some clients tell me to just go ahead. They've watched the rhythm, they can see the sales, and they'd rather not be a step in the chain any more. That's their call to make when they're comfortable, and it's not something I'd ever assume on day one.
No gatekeeping, no shadows. You see it running in front of you.
What we won't do
No fake reviews. No bought followers. No engagement pods. No cold DM blasting. No lifting a competitor's captions. No health or income claims we can't stand behind.
And look, that's not me being precious about it. It's that none of it works and I don't need it. You can buy a thousand followers tomorrow and not one sale gets better. You can buy reviews, and anybody who reads five of them in a row can feel that something's off. Meanwhile the actual track record is out there and has been for years, three retail stores, a supplement brand selling across a few countries, work in India, Dubai, Russia and Australia, and a decent pile of failures I've talked about openly on my own channels because they happened.
The product's good enough that I don't need to dress it up.
The honest bit
It isn't perfect. Some days the model goes sideways and produces something odd for no reason I can explain, and a human has to sit there and fix it by hand. AI's got a long way to go yet, whatever anyone tells you.
And I'm never going to sell you the Jarvis version, the fully autonomous thing people post about to farm followers. It doesn't exist. Anyone who has actually built with agents knows how many separate systems have to hold hands before one of them drops the ball, and in 2026 retail AI can barely do it.
What this actually is, is human heart with machine brain. The machine handles the volume and the memory. A person handles the taste and the judgement and carries the blame when it's wrong. I don't want to remove the most interesting part of making something, which is the part where a human decides.
The way I'd put it is that you stop being the bottleneck in your own marketing and start being the checkpoint. Nothing ships without you. Everything gets built without you.
Start by finding out what you've already got
If you want to know whether the content you're putting out now is doing anything at all before you hand it to anybody, that's what the audit is for. Three hundred dollars, a proper look through your site and your socials the way a customer sees them, and a list of what's leaking in the order it's costing you. Credited to your first month if you carry on.
You'll get a straight answer either way, and sometimes the straight answer is that you don't need us yet.
Frequently asked questions
- Is AI-generated marketing content just slop?
- Not by default. Slop is what happens when content is made in volume with nobody steering it and nobody approving it, and that existed before AI in the form of cheap outsourced copy-paste work. A language model only learns what you teach it, so what comes out is set by the context and the judgement going in.
- How do I know an agency isn't just running my brand through ChatGPT?
- Ask them three things. Who approves each post before it goes live. What happens to a piece you reject, meaning does anything in their process change or does it just get swapped for another one. And what you own if you walk away. Anyone reselling raw model output will struggle with the second question, because nothing in their setup remembers your feedback.
- Can anything be published without my approval?
- Not unless you decide it can. Every post is yours to approve first. After a couple of months some clients hand that over once they can see the results and trust the rhythm, but that's their decision to make, and it's never assumed at the start.
Want us to find your leaks for you?
A $300 website and social audit, reviewed the way your customer sees it. Credited to your first month.
Book your audit →Keep reading
